RESEARCH REPORT, EMAIL GATED, 2026
The AI Paradox
Why Sales Teams Using More AI Are Closing Fewer Deals.
of enterprise GenAI pilots produced no measurable P&L impact (MIT NANDA, 2025)
of sellers missed quota in 2025, up from 69 percent the year before (Ebsta and Pavilion)
average quota attainment across teams. Adoption is up. Closing is not.
Get the full report.
The PDF downloads instantly after you submit.
Sales teams have adopted artificial intelligence faster than almost any technology in the history of the profession. By every adoption metric, the revenue function has gone all in. And yet quota attainment is falling, response rates are at historic lows, and the function that received the most AI budget (sales and marketing) is delivering some of the lowest measurable returns of any department. This research report explains why, and what the top teams are doing differently.
What is inside the report.
- The two curves that should not coexist (adoption versus attainment).
- The mechanism, how more AI produces fewer deals.
- The misdiagnosis, why volume was never the bottleneck.
- The resolution, what authentically human selling actually means in the age of AI.
- A practical division of labor between AI and human work.
- Source notes citing MIT, HubSpot, Salesforce, Sopro, LinkedIn, Gartner, Bain, Xactly, and Forrester.
Get the research before your competitor does.
The full report is a 34-page download with the data, the mechanism, and the practical division of labor for AI-era selling teams.